[ Index ] [ CPA ] [ Conferences ] [ Legislation ] [ Publications ] [ Resources ] [ News ] [ Contact ] [ Search ]

 

California Psychiatric Association Documents
Psychiatry in Rural California


Psychiatric problems, including serious mental illness, are no less frequent in the rural areas of the state than they are in urban areas. The diagnosis and treatment of these problems is provided by a broad range of clinicians including psychiatrists, family practitioners, psychologists, clinical social workers, psychiatric nurses, psychiatric technicians, family and marriage counselors and community mental health workers. In small counties the majority of this work is delivered by the community mental health system, some is provided by the private sector and the remainder is provided in Indian Health Programs, Probation and Parole departments or by Jail Psychiatric Services.

Over the past two years some have questioned whether there are adequate numbers of Psychiatrists in California's rural areas. At least one group has stated that several California counties have no psychiatric coverage at all. Most would agree that all resources for the mentally ill in both rural and urban areas are woefully underfunded. The accusation made, however, appears to be specific to provision of service by psychiatrists and particularly as to the availability of psychiatrists available to prescribe psychotropic medication. Psychiatrists, of course, do more than just prescribe medication, however, the presumption is that most of these other things can be performed by other non-medical mental health practitioners.

It is the position of the California Psychiatric Association that psychiatric treatment is no less a priority in rural California than it is in the urban areas of the state. As a consequence the CPA has an undertaken a survey of all California counties under 225,000 population, 1 most of which are in rural areas, in an effort to ascertain whether there is adequate psychiatric coverage provided within the constraints of the various county mental health program budgets. It is important to distinguish between an adequate number of funded psychiatric positions to serve the needs of any one county and the ability of the county to fill the psychiatric position once funded. There are currently no state or national standards as to what constitutes optimal psychiatric staffing for a community mental health program. Goldman2 has devised a method for doing so utilizing the average active caseload and average number of new intakes however this method is not currently being utilized in California. It is certainly possible that some county programs do not have an adequate number of funded psychiatric positions, however, this is a different issue than being able to recruit psychiatrists for positions that are already funded. The CPA survey therefore focuses on the latter question and not the former. It remains for the various County Mental Health Programs and Mental Health Advisory Boards to determine what represents an optimal number of psychiatric positions for their respective counties.

The survey was carried out during the months of February and March 1996. Inquiries were made relating to current psychiatric staffing and problems that may have been encountered in recruiting psychiatrists. Respondents included the medical directors of county programs, program chiefs, staff psychiatrists and other administrative personnel. Other data resources included the yellow pages of the phone books of the various locales and the California Medical Association directory of physicians by specialty listed by county. (See attachment A for summary data and attachment B for specific coverage in each county).

Summary results:

Every California county with less than 225,000 population, with one exception, has either a part time or full time psychiatrist or more. Alpine county with a population of 1200 and only 14 active cases does not have a funded psychiatric position in it's community mental health program. They contract with a primary care physician one day a week for routine psychotropic medication monitoring and send more complicated cases to a psychiatrist in South Lake Tahoe about an hour away. There are no private psychiatrists either practicing or living within Alpine county.

Every community Mental Health Program in counties with less than 225, 000 population, with one exception, ha* psychiatric coverage provided within the constraints of the county's mental health budget. Merced county currently has an unfilled position for which they are currently recruiting. According to the medical director they have had problems in the past in recruiting but do currently have two applicants whom they have interviewed and they anticipate hiring one of these in the next two weeks.

Aside from those psychiatrists in private practice who are listed list in the phone books of small counties there are a number of other psychiatrists who either live or have offices in these counties. Some have full time active practices to the point they have no need to list while others have only small part time practices and work in other salaried positions such as community mental health, probation or parole, corrections, or at Indian Health clinics. In one case a psychiatrist works full time in a community mental health program in the Sacramento area and on weekends commutes two hundred miles north to maintain his small private practice.

One county, Colusa, had 12 applications for a part time position at the time the county was recruiting in August/September of 1995.

Dr. Arnold Solis has "bundled" at least three counties and developed a group of psychiatrists who cover Plumas, Glenn, and Lassen counties. As the need for more psychiatric time expanded Dr. Solis recruited at a psychiatric job fair in San Francisco sponsored by the Northern California Psychiatric Society and received 14 applications from psychiatrists interested in working in rural areas.


1 Napa county was not included due to the disproportionately high number psychiatrists living in the county and working at Napa State Hospital.

2 Goldman, C.R., Faulkner, L.R., Breeding, K.A.: A Method for Estimating Psychiatrist Staffing Needs in Community Mental Health Programs. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 45: 333-337, 1994.

3 Unduplicated Clients Served and Number of Admissions to Local Mental Health Programs, 1993-1994: Department of Mental Health, Performance Outcome and Reporting, California Statistical Abstract 1995.


Three counties, Humboldt, Alpine and Merced, have Institutes for Mental Diseases within their boundaries. All three utilize in-house psychiatrists and indicated they have no difficulty in obtaining them.

Dr. Richard Dorsey, who pioneered Telepsychiatry in Riverside county for use in an understaffed rural outpatient clinic, no longer uses it in this setting because he now has sufficient "live" psychiatric coverage. When he attempted to facilitate the use of Telepsychiatry by contacting counties that were advertising for psychiatrists in the past six months he was told by those counties that they had more than sufficient application for their positions and that they had no need to implement this type of approach. Dr. Dorsey continues to feel Telepsychiatry will be a very useful resource in the future and is now using it fourteen hours a day in a psychiatric emergency room Riverside County has recently opened in Indio. He relates that both patients and the County Mental Health Advisory Board have been very pleased with the new technology.

Some counties utilize Locum Tenens psychiatrists to fill positions that have been recently vacated or newly funded while recruiting permanent physicians to fill the position.

In talking with respondents they cited several factors in their ability to psychiatrists to their areas.

At least three of the respondents were very pleased with their success in recruiting psychiatrists through the Northern California Psychiatric Society job fair.

One county, Placer, and Kingsview, which contracts for psychiatric coverage for three rural counties, report establishing relationships with the psychiatric residency programs at UCD in Sacramento and UCSF in Fresno respectively. Dr. Peter Vanaucken, medical director in Placer County, and Mr. Larry Risinger, CEO for Kingsview, report this relationship has very much facilitated recruitment of young psychiatrists into their programs and as a consequence they experience little difficulty in this regard.

Managed care has created an environment that many private practitioners find intolerable. They are therefore opting to move into the public sector and particularly into Community Mental Health Programs.

Several respondents noted that they have had applications from Los Angles and from the Bay Area indicating an interest on the part of some to practice in a more relaxed, rural setting.

Some counties, although unfortunately not all, incorporate the psychiatrist into program planning, quality care activities, continuing medical education, and provide the opportunity for a number of treatment responsibilities including hospital and or correctional consultation, forensic evaluation, second opinions, and in some cases opportunity for selected psychotherapeutic cases in addition to the traditional medication monitoring role. It was the feeling of some of the respondents that this solidifies the psychiatrist's commitment to the program, they feel more of a partner and experience more job satisfaction than if they merely prescribe medication.

The California Psychiatric Association stands ready to work with any small, rural county in the event that they do have difficulty in recruiting psychiatrists in the future.

CPA has in the past contributed free advertising in it's newsletters for small rural counties that are recruiting psychiatrists and will continue to do so in the future.

CPA District Branch newsletters will provide pro bono advertising to rural counties within the District Branch boundaries which are attempting to recruit psychiatrists.

CPA will review job descriptions or contracts and make suggestions as to what might be modified to make a particular position more attractive in small rural counties.

CPA, through it's Access to Care Task Force, will continue to monitor the issue of recruitment to and availability of psychiatrists in rural areas and explore issues of quality of care as they may relate to the problem of access. Should recruiting of psychiatrists to county mental health programs become a problem the Task Force will explore with the American Psychiatric Association utilization of their APA Job Bank to help facilitate recruitment to California.

CPA will continue to work with the CMA Task Force on Rural Mental Health to assure that primary care physicians are provided timely and useful information relating to the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. For a copy of Psychotropic Medications: Prescribing Guidelines for Primary Care Physicians, call the California Psychiatric Association office at 1 - (916) - 442 - 5196.

CPA is not unaware that the presence of psychiatrists in a county does not necessarily equate with access. Some of the psychiatrists listed in the phone book, or who are practicing but not listed, may not currently be taking new patients. Caseloads fluctuate and are sometimes full. Some practitioners take only limited numbers of MediCal patients. Managed Care complicates the situation even more in that enrollees can see only those physicians and psychiatrists who are on the panels of the managed care companies. CPA will continue to support the concept of a "point of service" option thus allowing the managed care enrollee to see the psychiatrist of their choice so that access is not curtailed in areas where there is no panel provider. By mid 1997, Fee for Service MediCal will be consolidated within the local Community.

Mental Health Programs and will no longer be available in the private sector. This should afford universal access to treatment for the seriously mentally ill in all counties. It will, however, have to be monitored closely to assure that there is active outreach for those who might not otherwise readily seek out county mental health providers.


Appendix A Data Summary

Psychiatrists & Other Physicians, and Psychologists In Rural Counties
(Highlights of Spring, 1996 Survey of Psychiatry in Rural California by California Psychiatric Association)

Appendix B
Psychiatrists by County, March 1996
This listing is available in the pamphlet, Psychiatry In Rural California.
To order please contact California Psychiatric Association


California Psychiatric Association DISCLAIMER
[ Index ] [ CPA ] [ Conferences ] [ Legislation ] [ Publications ] [ Resources ] [ News ] [ Contact ] [ Search ]