[ Index ] [ CPA ] [ Conferences ] [ Legislation ] [ Publications ] [ Resources ] [ News ] [ Contact ] [ Search ]

 

California Psychiatric Association
Legislative Priorities for 1997
Assembly Bill 250 Literature

California Psychiatric Association Opposes AB 250, As Introduced


AB 250 would vitiate the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act (MICRA) by removing the cap on noneconomic damages in many cases. In California, professional liability insurance is affordable largely as a result of the existence of MICRA. When this important law was enacted, malpractice insurance costs were out of control, with doctors consequently leaving California or going uninsured. Because of MICRA's enactment, doctors in California carry adequate liability Insurance, patients are compensated when medical negligence occurs, litigation costs arc held down, health care costs are controlled, and doctors are willing to continue to perform risky medical procedures on extremely sick patients.

Several of the exceptions to the cap proposed by AB 250 describe conduct which would merit the award of punitive damages, and there is certainly no cap on those damages. With these exceptions in the law insurance carriers would face a level of uncertainty of risk which would cause them to raise rates, perhaps in large amounts. This is likely to result in doctors having to increase their fees, which would have the greatest negative impacts on lower income Californians.

Because of these concerns, the California Psychiatric Association
must oppose AB 250.


California Psychiatric Association DISCLAIMER
[ Index ] [ CPA ] [ Conferences ] [ Legislation ] [ Publications ] [ Resources ] [ News ] [ Contact ] [ Search ]