[ Index ] [ CPA ] [ Conferences ] [ Legislation ] [ Publications ] [ Resources ] [ News ] [ Contact ] [ Search ]

 

California Psychiatric Association
Legislative Priorities for 1999
Senate Bill 2050 Literature

PSYCHOLOGISTS' CLAIMS VS. REAL FACTS


Claim: There is a large number of underserved mentally ill individuals, many of whom need medication.

Fact: This is correct. But this bill does not provide the answer. In fact psychologists are not the health professionals who treat the underserved.

  • Psychiatrists treat the poorer, sicker patients (1)
  • Psychologists treat a larger proportion of white, employed, insured, highly educated, wealthy and less impaired people than do psychiatrists (1)
  • The patients are underserved primarily because of lack of insurance coverage and lack of funds to pay for their own care.

Claim: There is a shortage of psychiatrists, and no shortage of psychologists. Psychologists are available. "24 counties have 5 or fewer psychiatrists, and patients must turn to other health care providers with little or no training in mental health. If psychologists could prescribe this problem would be drastically reduced." (Quoted from the psychologists' own materials).

Fact: The truth or fiction of this statement is a non-sequitur with respect to this bill. However, the information below refutes the claim. Further, any shortage in rural California can be addressed in other ways which deliver medical services by physicians to those with biological brain diseases, not by non-medically-trained behavioralists. Further:

  • The numbers the psychologists used are inaccurate. They use a source which is out of date, and counts only a little over half of California's psychiatrists. County lines are artificial boundaries, and do not take into account the psychiatrists who "circuit ride" in less populous areas of the state. Research the California Psychiatric Association has done to obtain actual numbers through county sources reveal that Alpine County is the only county lacking direct psychiatric coverage, and it has only 1200 people, 14 patients, and no psychologists, either. All other counties have psychiatric coverage, whereas many do not have psychologists. See the attached summary of a study conducted by the California Psychiatric Association in 1996.

In anticipation of a hearing in December, 1997, CPA obtained a more current list from the Board of Psychology in July of 1997. It revealed that little had changed. As of November, 1997:

  • 4 counties have no psychologists, although San Benito now had one, Glenn now has none;
  • 3 counties have one psychologist;
  • 5 counties have 2 psychologists;
  • 3 counties have only 3 psychologists, resulting in 16 counties with 3 or fewer psychologists, and 13 with 2 or fewer; and
  • 18 counties have 5 or fewer psychologists.
  • 21 of the 24 counties noted by the psychologists as having less that 5 psychiatrists have less than 75,000 people, 16 have less than 50,000 people, 12 have fewer than 30,000 people, and only one has more than 137,000 people. The need for psychiatrists in rural California is being met by alternative methods of access to adequately trained psychiatrist physicians, such as telemedicine; non-discriminatory health care coverage by both managed care companies and Medi-Cal; the recruitment efforts that have been undertaken by our association in cooperation with the counties; and circuit riding. Additionally, U.C. hospitals are developing a telemedicine hotline, where consultations for primary care physicians with psychiatrists would be available 24 hours per day.
  • Psychologists are generally located in the same geographic areas as psychiatrists, so the existence of additional psychologists is irrelevant. (4) It is interesting that the psychologists give no distribution on psychologists, only psychiatrists. The reason is that there are fewer psychologists in many rural areas. See the attached.
  • The number of psychiatric residents increased by about 24% from 1982-83 to 1989-90, and has held steady at about 6,100 per year since that date. In 1997, the percentage of medical school graduates choosing residencies in psychiatry increased by 3.13 % (3), (7).
  • The nation's medical schools are responding to the increasing emphasis on family practice by creating combined 5-year residencies in family practice and psychiatry. In 1996, 7 of these combined programs were approved, including ones at U.C. Davis and U.C. San Diego (5).
  • Only 60% of the members of the American Psychological Association identify themselves as health service providers. (6)

Claim: Most brain medications are prescribed by non-psychiatrist physicians, who receive little training in mental health.

Fact: The argument confuses the training of physicians and behavioralists. Psychiatrists and other physicians are trained to diagnose and treat human illness, which includes the brain and the rest of the body and the use and side effects of medication in treating those illnesses. Psychologists are trained in human behavior. Medications are used to treat body chemistry and are biologically based. Physicians are also trained to find a biological disorder of one part of the body masking itself in another part of the body, including the brain. Medicine and behavioral studies are distinct and different. They can and must interface, but neither is the other.

Most of these brain medications prescribed by primary care physicians are benzodiazapines (tranquilizers) or anti-depressants used for patients with milder symptoms and not severe brain disorders. Family physicians usually refer patients to psychiatrists for lithium, antipsychotics, and the other medications used for the more severe brain disorders.(1) This is the standard practice in today's managed care environment. Further, the non psychiatrist M.D.s are still M.D.s, not behavioral counselors. The medications are used for biological brain disorders, not "mental" behavioral issues.


Claim: Psychologists cost less

Fact: The cost per visit for psychiatrists and psychologists is nearly the same. (2)


Claim: Non-psychiatric physicians do not tend to refer to mental health specialists for care of mental health patients.

Fact: The article cited in footnote (1) notes that patients' utilization of services tend to be distributed about equally between general practitioners, psychiatrists, psychologists, and "other health professionals." The distribution of outpatient visits generally breaks down as follows:

  • psychiatrists treat the bulk of the severe brain disorders, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe depression;
  • general physicians treat the bulk of substance abuse and adjustment disorders;
  • psychologists treat the bulk of anxiety disorders, "isolated symptoms" and "other symptoms;"
  • "other health providers" treat the bulk of childhood disorders and mental retardation. (1)

Claim: Psychologists are increasingly practicing in settings where the seriously mentally ill are treated, where patients need medications.

Fact: Those settings are called hospitals, and psychiatrists are clearly available there.


Claim: Many non-physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, dentists, & podiatrists, have authority to write prescriptions.

Fact: Nurse practitioners and physicians' assistants have substantial training in the medical model and are authorized to dispense limited kinds of medications, under the supervision of a physician- they do not practice independently of a physician, as this bill would allow psychologists to do. They generally dispense birth control pills, antibiotics, decongestants, and topical skin medications-not brain medications. Podiatrists and dentists are trained in the medical model, having a 4-year program in their specialty, which includes substantial training in anatomy & physiology, and are limited to the foot and the mouth, respectively.


Claim: Studies have shown that non-MD providers can safely and satisfactorily prescribe medications without the supervision of a physician.

Fact: What studies?


Claim: The Department of Defense Demonstration Project showed that this training works. "The DOD permits military psychologists who have completed the required training to prescribe medications for patients." (Quoted from psychologists' materials)

Fact: In the DOD project, the participants were licensed psychologists who then received 3 or more years of training, one year full time in the classroom, one year clinical and one year proctorship. The program was audited by the U.S. Government Accounting Office, and in an April 1, 1997 report, the GAO recommended that the program be discontinued, pointing out that, although when the project was begun, it was expected the psychologists would be allowed to practice independently, it is doubtful any of them ever will be authorized to practice other than under the close supervision of a psychiatrist. Some proposals would allow independent practice by psychologists after less than the equivalent of 0.3 years of medical school course work, plus 800 hours supervised practice, compared to psychiatrists' and other physicians' 4000 or more hours of course work in medical school, including at least 72 hours of supervised clinical practice, and 10,000 to 12,000 of supervised practice in residency, more than a 13 to 1 differential. Does California really want to allow this experiment, and is it worth the money and risk?


Claim: With an average of 7.2 years of study, psychologists are the most highly-trained mental health professionals.

Fact: The average may be 7.2 years, but the full-time equivalent is 5 years, 4 years of graduate school and one year of clinical work. Apparently the psychologists have concluded that psychiatrists are not "mental health professionals" since they have to have 8 years of full-time study (4 years medical school, 4 years residency).


(1) Study reported in the American Journal of Psychiatry, 153:10, October, 1996.
(2) Study reported in Open Minds, Volume 2, Issue 2, May, 1989.
(3) American Psychiatric Association annual censuses of residents.
(4) Geographic Access to Psychiatrists' Services: A county-Level Analysis, Lewin / ICF, prepared by the American Psychiatric Association, January, 1989.
(5) Psychiatric News, January 17, 1997
(6) summary of the Report of the Ad Hoc Task Force on Psychopharmacology of the American Psychological Association, Smyer, M. et. al., Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 24, No. 4, page 400, 1993.
(7) Psychiatric News, Volume XXXII, Number 8, April 18, 1997, page 1.

March 3, 1998


California Psychiatric Association DISCLAIMER
[ Index ] [ CPA ] [ Conferences ] [ Legislation ] [ Publications ] [ Resources ] [ News ] [ Contact ] [ Search ]