[ Index ] [ CPA ] [ Conferences ] [ Legislation ] [ Publications ] [ Resources ] [ News ] [ Contact ] [ Search ]

 

California Psychiatric Association
Legislative Priorities for 2004

Assembly Bill 2645 (Mountjoy)


California Psychiatric Association
OPPOSES AB 2645 (Mountjoy)


TALKING POINTS
(AB 2645)

  1. The underlying bias in AB 2645 is that there is a widespread social problem in overmedicating foster youth with psychotropics. The truth is that the biggest problem facing foster youth is that about half of foster youth do not receive medical or mental health care at all.
  2. A 1999 study of Los Angeles County foster youth by Dr. Bonnie Zima at UCLA entitled "Psychotropic Medication Treatment Patterns Among School-Aged Children in Foster Care" indicates that 16% of school-aged foster children have taken psychotropic medication during their lifetime. 86% of the Parents of these children reported that they perceived a benefit from their psychotropic medications. 89% of the Children reported that they experienced some benefit from the medications that they took.
  3. The study design in AB 2645 is fatally flawed and will not yield useful data to improve quality of care for foster youth. In fact it could produce misleading data. It does not call for collecting data on diagnosis; whether specialty physicians or primary care physicians wrote the scripts; whether provided medications were linked to the appropriate diagnosis and used in optimal doses; whether other treatment interventions were used; nor, any information on outcomes. A simple number indicating the numbers of foster youth receiving medication, by itself is not meaningful at all!
  4. The counties indicated for study do not constitute a representative sample and therefore even if it were possible to get useful data, it would not be generalizable to other counties or the rest of California.
  5. Psychotropic medications are already the most restricted medications prescribed for foster youth because SB 543 (Bowen, 1999) requires a court order before a foster child may be administered any psychiatric medication.
  6. A properly designed study of foster youth, with appropriate safeguards as required by Federal law (Institutional Review Boards, parental or guardian consents), would be prohibitively expensive and not the best use of taxpayers money in this budget environment.
  7. The California Department of Social Services does not contain the proper expertise to conduct a valid, generalizable medication study.

AB 2645 BACKGROUND  -  SAMPLE LETTER


California Psychiatric Association DISCLAIMER
[ Index ] [ CPA ] [ Conferences ] [ Legislation ] [ Publications ] [ Resources ] [ News ] [ Contact ] [ Search ]